0 Comments
Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Mirage
100%
Ancient
50%
Anubis
44%
Inferno
25%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
3
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
4
2
Mirage
100%
4
4
Ancient
50%
14
1
Anubis
44%
9
2
Inferno
25%
4
4
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Nuke
0%
0
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Map Analysis of Tkk esports vs Gucci Academy by the Bo3.gg Team
Gucci Academy on Ancient Analysis
Gucci Academy demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Gucci Academy on Ancient were soulfly, who contributed 12 kills, and Ciocardau, who added 12 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 6231 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Ancient, Gucci Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Tkk esports on Ancient Analysis
Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for Tkk esports, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Tkk esports on Ancient included lov1kus, who contributed 16 kills, and supra, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6006 total damage, Tkk esports couldn't prevent Gucci Academy from securing victory on Ancient
On the defensive side of Ancient, Tkk esports struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments