0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.916.3
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
18.34.1
Assists on a map
10.084.4315
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:21s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
77%
Anubis
75%
Inferno
70%
Dust II
69%
Mirage
58%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
15%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
1
4
Inferno
0%
0
6
Dust II
0%
0
2
Mirage
17%
6
0
Nuke
0%
0
4
Ancient
40%
5
1
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
77%
13
31
Anubis
75%
20
29
Inferno
70%
20
13
Dust II
69%
13
13
Mirage
75%
24
22
Nuke
50%
10
36
Ancient
55%
31
24
Info
Match analysis of timbermen vs NRG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between timbermen and NRG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by NRG. The MVP of this match was oSee.
NRG analytics
The team NRG secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for NRG were oSee contributed 18 kills and autimatic contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7699 overall damage.
On the defensive side, NRG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
timbermen analytics
The team timbermen managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for timbermen were snav contributed 13 kills and nero contributed 13 kills. 5901 of total damage by timbermen could not prevent NRG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, timbermen struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments