0 Comments
204
171
35
+33
415
25:27
54
8
Nuke6.7
+16%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
67%
Overpass
60%
Nuke
46%
Ancient
43%
Mirage
17%
Vertigo
4%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
67%
3
0
Overpass
40%
10
0
Nuke
59%
27
0
Ancient
68%
25
0
Mirage
60%
5
0
Vertigo
46%
13
0
Dust II
40%
5
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
13%
8
0
Ancient
25%
8
0
Mirage
43%
7
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Dust II
40%
5
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwlw
- llll
Info
Match analysis of ThunderFlash vs M1 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ThunderFlash and M1, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Dust II, Nuke, and victory was secured by ThunderFlash. The MVP of this match was sh3nanigan.
ThunderFlash analytics
The team ThunderFlash secured 0 out of 52 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ThunderFlash were sh3nanigan contributed 47 kills and asran contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 21603 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ThunderFlash held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
M1 analytics
The team M1 managed to secure 52 out of 52 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 8 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for M1 were Frontsider contributed 44 kills and discoStar contributed 39 kills. 18793 of total damage by M1 could not prevent ThunderFlash from securing the victory
On the defensive side, M1 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 26 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments