0 Comments
108
181
22
-73
307
12:31
25
3
Nuke5
-22%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
54%
Overpass
54%
Dust II
50%
Nuke
35%
Anubis
33%
Ancient
31%
Vertigo
29%
Mirage
20%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
3
1
Overpass
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
20%
5
0
Anubis
40%
5
0
Ancient
67%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Mirage
75%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
54%
41
11
Overpass
54%
35
7
Dust II
50%
2
0
Nuke
55%
22
9
Anubis
73%
22
10
Ancient
36%
11
49
Vertigo
29%
17
28
Mirage
55%
31
10
Last results
Past matches
- llwwl
- wllwl
Info
Match analysis of ThunderFlash vs Illuminar by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between ThunderFlash and Illuminar, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Inferno, and victory was secured by Illuminar. The MVP of this match was m4tthi.
Illuminar analytics
The team Illuminar secured 32 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Illuminar were m4tthi contributed 43 kills and morelz contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19012 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Illuminar held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
ThunderFlash analytics
The team ThunderFlash managed to secure 11 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for ThunderFlash were 1337Majster contributed 29 kills and Flayy contributed 26 kills. 13197 of total damage by ThunderFlash could not prevent Illuminar from securing the victory
On the defensive side, ThunderFlash struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments