0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
154.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
51.116.7
AWP kills on a map
196.5798
HE damage (avg/round)
11.73.4
Damage (total/round)
38773
Player score (round)
37291012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
10226.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
61%
Nuke
45%
Inferno
35%
Mirage
23%
Dust II
17%
Overpass
10%
Ancient
8%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
61%
18
2
Nuke
0%
0
25
Inferno
75%
36
0
Mirage
56%
16
5
Dust II
46%
13
9
Overpass
53%
19
14
Ancient
33%
12
6
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
12
Nuke
45%
11
2
Inferno
40%
5
1
Mirage
33%
9
1
Dust II
29%
7
3
Overpass
63%
8
5
Ancient
25%
4
5
Info
Match analysis of The Union vs Arvum by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between The Union and Arvum, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by The Union. The MVP of this match was DANVIET.
The Union analytics
The team The Union secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for The Union were DANVIET contributed 42 kills and wZdd contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 18536 overall damage.
On the defensive side, The Union held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Arvum analytics
The team Arvum managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Arvum were minimal contributed 26 kills and tom1jed contributed 32 kills. 12947 of total damage by Arvum could not prevent The Union from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Arvum struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments