56
82
18
-26
337
10:10
13
1
-15%
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- —
- —
- —
- —
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
T
100%
Ancient
59%
Anubis
59%
Mirage
57%
Dust II
T
50%
Nuke
37%
Vertigo
33%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
19
Ancient
59%
37
0
Anubis
59%
32
0
Mirage
57%
7
8
Dust II
50%
18
2
Nuke
37%
19
3
Vertigo
33%
9
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Map Analysis of The Spells vs VP.Prodigy by the Bo3.gg Team
The Spells on Inferno Analysis
The Spells demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for The Spells on Inferno were azizz, who contributed 20 kills, and discoStar, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8571 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, The Spells held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
VP.Prodigy on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for VP.Prodigy, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for VP.Prodigy on Inferno included Shady, who contributed 15 kills, and Dwushka, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6736 total damage, VP.Prodigy couldn't prevent The Spells from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, VP.Prodigy struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments