0 Comments
Teams advantage Dust II (M0)
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
44%
Anubis
44%
Nuke
T
33%
Inferno
T
28%
Ancient
13%
Dust II
3%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Nuke
50%
2
0
Inferno
67%
3
0
Ancient
0%
2
0
Dust II
40%
5
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
44%
18
0
Anubis
44%
27
0
Nuke
17%
6
2
Inferno
39%
18
0
Ancient
13%
15
3
Dust II
43%
14
0
Mirage
0%
0
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwwll
- wllll
Info
Map Analysis of The Spells vs ADEPTS by the Bo3.gg Team
The Spells on Dust II Analysis
The Spells demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for The Spells on Dust II were discoStar, who contributed 24 kills, and Sobol, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8065 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, The Spells held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
ADEPTS on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for ADEPTS, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for ADEPTS on Dust II included cHeuuuuk, who contributed 13 kills, and HippoV, who added 14 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7401 total damage, ADEPTS couldn't prevent The Spells from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, ADEPTS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments