0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE kills on a map
21.1175
USP kills on a map
31.5972
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.2369
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4531
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
15.84.2
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
HE damage (total/round)
8826.1
HE damage (total/round)
15126.1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
73%
Nuke
50%
Train
50%
Ancient
48%
Inferno
44%
Mirage
30%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
11
Nuke
0%
2
6
Train
0%
1
4
Ancient
8%
13
5
Inferno
20%
5
1
Mirage
33%
9
2
Dust II
0%
5
6
Last 5 maps
Anubis
73%
11
5
Nuke
50%
6
8
Train
50%
2
8
Ancient
56%
9
16
Inferno
64%
22
3
Mirage
63%
16
3
Dust II
0%
0
26
Info
Match analysis of The QUBE vs TYLOO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between The QUBE and TYLOO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by TYLOO. The MVP of this match was Jee.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for TYLOO were Jee contributed 20 kills and Moseyuh contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7791 overall damage.
On the defensive side, TYLOO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
The QUBE analytics
The team The QUBE managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for The QUBE were Kamui contributed 14 kills and Uncrown contributed 12 kills. 5887 of total damage by The QUBE could not prevent TYLOO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, The QUBE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments