0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
126.6606
M4A1 kills on a map
104.5517
Speed Round (sec)
00:30s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:32s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:54s
Damage (total/round)
42773
Player score (round)
41331011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Zeus kills
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Nuke
50%
Inferno
33%
Mirage
33%
Anubis
21%
Vertigo
0%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
100%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
75%
4
0
Anubis
80%
5
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
50%
6
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
9
Nuke
50%
6
15
Inferno
33%
3
16
Mirage
42%
12
1
Anubis
59%
17
1
Vertigo
0%
2
6
Ancient
50%
20
1
Info
Match analysis of The QUBE vs GR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between The QUBE and GR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by GR. The MVP of this match was weqt2.
GR analytics
The team GR secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GR were weqt2 contributed 21 kills and SALO_MUX contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7633 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
The QUBE analytics
The team The QUBE managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for The QUBE were gl_247 contributed 12 kills and Randy contributed 9 kills. 4962 of total damage by The QUBE could not prevent GR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, The QUBE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments