0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
124.3478
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:24s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
41573
Player score (round)
38771010
Damage (total/round)
39473
Player score (round)
37981010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
58%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
44%
Mirage
26%
Inferno
23%
Dust II
8%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
3
5
Nuke
50%
2
0
Ancient
36%
14
0
Mirage
45%
11
2
Inferno
43%
7
0
Dust II
33%
3
1
Vertigo
0%
2
3
Last 5 maps
Anubis
58%
12
2
Nuke
0%
0
8
Ancient
80%
15
0
Mirage
71%
7
3
Inferno
20%
5
3
Dust II
25%
4
5
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of The QUBE vs GR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between The QUBE and GR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by GR. The MVP of this match was rate.
GR analytics
The team GR secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GR were weqt2 contributed 20 kills and SALO_MUX contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9022 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
The QUBE analytics
The team The QUBE managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for The QUBE were rate contributed 22 kills and gl_247 contributed 16 kills. 7949 of total damage by The QUBE could not prevent GR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, The QUBE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments