0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
61%
Mirage
59%
Inferno
26%
Nuke
26%
Vertigo
25%
Ancient
8%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
0
7
Mirage
0%
5
3
Inferno
29%
7
6
Nuke
67%
3
8
Vertigo
38%
13
0
Ancient
62%
13
0
Overpass
50%
4
0
Last 5 maps
Anubis
61%
23
8
Mirage
59%
29
12
Inferno
55%
20
19
Nuke
41%
22
17
Vertigo
63%
8
38
Ancient
54%
28
5
Overpass
50%
24
29
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwll
- wwlww
Info
Map Analysis of The Prodigies SE vs ARCRED by the Bo3.gg Team
ARCRED on Inferno Analysis
ARCRED demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for ARCRED on Inferno were DSSj, who contributed 22 kills, and hurtslxrd, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7557 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, ARCRED held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
The Prodigies SE on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for The Prodigies SE, as they managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for The Prodigies SE on Inferno included upE, who contributed 14 kills, and pupcake, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6609 total damage, The Prodigies SE couldn't prevent ARCRED from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, The Prodigies SE struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments