0 Comments
129
186
24
-57
305
19:28
30
2
Inferno5
-18%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
100%
Inferno
59%
Mirage
41%
Overpass
31%
Anubis
22%
Nuke
15%
Vertigo
4%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
100%
2
0
Inferno
0%
3
0
Mirage
83%
6
0
Overpass
33%
3
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Nuke
50%
8
0
Vertigo
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
48
Inferno
59%
17
12
Mirage
42%
12
15
Overpass
64%
14
12
Anubis
72%
25
1
Nuke
65%
17
11
Vertigo
46%
13
17
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlww
- llwww
Info
Match analysis of The Chosen Few vs Eternal Fire by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between The Chosen Few and Eternal Fire, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by Eternal Fire. The MVP of this match was XANTARES.
Eternal Fire analytics
The team Eternal Fire secured 32 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Eternal Fire were XANTARES contributed 50 kills and woxic contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19421 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Eternal Fire held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
The Chosen Few analytics
The team The Chosen Few managed to secure 15 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for The Chosen Few were colorzz contributed 33 kills and Libido contributed 27 kills. 14284 of total damage by The Chosen Few could not prevent Eternal Fire from securing the victory
On the defensive side, The Chosen Few struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments