0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
6.8
5.3
Ancient1.5
Win Rounds
0
0
Ancient0
Kills
0
0
Ancient0
Damage
0
0
Ancient0
Economy
787.75K
606.95K
Ancient91200
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
67%
Ancient
60%
Nuke
25%
Mirage
25%
Inferno
0%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
67%
3
0
Ancient
60%
5
0
Nuke
25%
4
1
Mirage
25%
4
0
Inferno
0%
2
1
Overpass
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
2
1
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of Agency vs Camarinha by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Agency and Camarinha, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by Agency. The MVP of this match was Didjey.
Agency analytics
The team Agency secured 26 out of 38 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Ancient. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Agency were Didjey contributed 38 kills and hdstr contributed 28 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15174 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Agency held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Camarinha analytics
The team Camarinha managed to secure 12 out of 38 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Camarinha were Ram0s contributed 26 kills and Sprayy contributed 24 kills. 11711 of total damage by Camarinha could not prevent Agency from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Camarinha struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments