0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
41.3011
Damage (total/round)
45173
Player score (round)
44401010
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
39281010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
40991010
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
38691010
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
71%
Ancient
66%
Vertigo
55%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
3%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
71%
21
2
Ancient
66%
44
0
Vertigo
55%
11
4
Inferno
50%
20
4
Nuke
100%
1
11
Mirage
53%
19
4
Anubis
50%
34
1
Info
Match analysis of TGM vs Leo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TGM and Leo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Leo. The MVP of this match was Malkiss.
Leo analytics
The team Leo secured 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Leo were Malkiss contributed 26 kills and kr1vda contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11736 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Leo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TGM analytics
The team TGM managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TGM were lesswill contributed 20 kills and speed4k contributed 21 kills. 10163 of total damage by TGM could not prevent Leo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TGM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments