0 Comments
165
132
60
+33
422
26:16
42
5
Dust II6.6
0%
Teams advantage
Score
5.7
6.9
Dust II0.9
Win Rounds
0
0
Dust II0
Kills
0
0
Dust II0
Damage
0
0
Dust II0
Economy
757.05K
865.6K
Dust II56900
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.6027
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
M4A1 kills on a map
104.4189
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4482
Trades on a map
10.563.428
Speed Round (sec)
00:23s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
38473
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42491010
Player score (round)
34731010
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Info
Match analysis of TGD Pro vs Mixzada by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TGD Pro and Mixzada, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Dust II, and victory was secured by Mixzada. The MVP of this match was KIMBARREiROS.
Mixzada analytics
The team Mixzada secured 26 out of 44 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Dust II. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Mixzada were KIMBARREiROS contributed 42 kills and Virgolino contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17709 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Mixzada held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TGD Pro analytics
The team TGD Pro managed to secure 18 out of 44 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 7 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TGD Pro were xNanoEL6x contributed 26 kills and Taero contributed 30 kills. 14745 of total damage by TGD Pro could not prevent Mixzada from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TGD Pro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments