0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.1
7
Nuke1.8
Win Rounds
0
0
Nuke0
Kills
0
0
Nuke0
Damage
0
0
Nuke0
Economy
338.55K
422K
Nuke83450
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
42%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Ancient
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Nuke
33%
6
0
Overpass
0%
2
0
Vertigo
0%
3
0
Ancient
0%
5
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
0
Inferno
50%
2
0
Nuke
75%
8
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
2
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wllll
- llwwl
Info
Match analysis of Young Prodigies vs Armann by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Young Prodigies and Armann, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Armann. The MVP of this match was brnr.
Armann analytics
The team Armann secured 0 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Armann were brnr contributed 22 kills and ofvirkur contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8638 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Armann held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Young Prodigies analytics
The team Young Prodigies managed to secure 21 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Young Prodigies were EINAR contributed 18 kills and Moshii contributed 12 kills. 6826 of total damage by Young Prodigies could not prevent Armann from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Young Prodigies struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments