0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
4
7.5
Ancient3.4
Win Rounds
2
16
Ancient14
Kills
27
81
Ancient54
Damage
3.41K
8.31K
Ancient4900
Economy
225.05K
490.45K
Ancient265400
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
69%
Inferno
59%
Dust II
56%
Mirage
55%
Overpass
44%
Vertigo
44%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Ancient
69%
35
12
Inferno
59%
61
2
Dust II
56%
36
7
Mirage
55%
49
4
Overpass
44%
32
24
Vertigo
44%
25
23
Nuke
0%
0
63
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- l
- lwwwl
Info
Match analysis of TeamEternal vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TeamEternal and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was nbqq.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 18 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were nbqq contributed 22 kills and Valencio contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8438 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TeamEternal analytics
The team TeamEternal managed to secure 0 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TeamEternal were s1nf contributed 11 kills and w1d contributed 9 kills. 3408 of total damage by TeamEternal could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TeamEternal struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments