0 Comments
73
46
15
+27
426
11:7
20
0
Ancient7.1
+54%
Teams advantage
Score
7.1
4.9
Ancient2.1
Win Rounds
13
5
Ancient8
Kills
73
47
Ancient26
Damage
7.66K
5.43K
Ancient2238
Economy
389.8K
313.1K
Ancient76700
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
Galil kills on a map
51.8164
M4A1 kills on a map
104.4189
Player score (round)
35261010
Player score (round)
37831010
Player score (round)
40511010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- —
- —
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Info
Match analysis of PeeP vs esmagaB by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PeeP and esmagaB, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by PeeP. The MVP of this match was bogemtdarf.
PeeP analytics
The team PeeP secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for PeeP were bogemtdarf contributed 23 kills and la3euka contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7664 overall damage.
On the defensive side, PeeP held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
esmagaB analytics
The team esmagaB managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for esmagaB were NOPEEJ contributed 10 kills and Sprayy contributed 8 kills. 5426 of total damage by esmagaB could not prevent PeeP from securing the victory
On the defensive side, esmagaB struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments