0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:28s01:27s
Deagle damage (avg/round)
16.85.4
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3025
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
11.13.5
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
11.13.9
Headshots on a map
220.3126
Eco wins full buy
1
Player score (round)
35021011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
39151011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Ancient
100%
Dust II
0%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
0
Ancient
100%
1
0
Dust II
0%
0
1
Overpass
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of Team NadeKing vs Team Pimp by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Team NadeKing and Team Pimp, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by Team Pimp. The MVP of this match was Lekr0.
Team Pimp analytics
The team Team Pimp secured 32 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Team Pimp were iM contributed 43 kills and Pimp contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19611 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Team Pimp held their ground firmly, successfully defending 22 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Team NadeKing analytics
The team Team NadeKing managed to secure 15 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Team NadeKing were Lekr0 contributed 44 kills and ASTRA contributed 35 kills. 15920 of total damage by Team NadeKing could not prevent Team Pimp from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Team NadeKing struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments