Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AWP kills on a map
186.5798
Player score (round)
36901012
Shots (total/round)
8316
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
9026.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:19s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
71%
Nuke
69%
Overpass
63%
Inferno
62%
Vertigo
60%
Mirage
9%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
71%
7
7
Nuke
31%
13
4
Overpass
63%
19
0
Inferno
38%
8
10
Vertigo
60%
5
9
Mirage
59%
17
3
Ancient
0%
1
18
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
100%
1
2
Overpass
0%
1
2
Inferno
100%
3
0
Vertigo
0%
1
1
Mirage
50%
2
0
Ancient
0%
0
2
Info
Match analysis of OneTap vs Israel by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between OneTap and Israel, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by OneTap. The MVP of this match was smekk.
OneTap analytics
The team OneTap secured 16 out of 27 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for OneTap were smekk contributed 29 kills and MoDo contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 11136 overall damage.
On the defensive side, OneTap held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Israel analytics
The team Israel managed to secure 11 out of 27 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Israel were meztal contributed 23 kills and MOREE contributed 19 kills. 9684 of total damage by Israel could not prevent OneTap from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Israel struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments