0 Comments
Teams advantage
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Nuke
91%
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
57%
Anubis
33%
Inferno
23%
Mirage
20%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
21
Nuke
91%
11
2
Vertigo
67%
6
6
Ancient
57%
7
7
Anubis
33%
6
3
Inferno
23%
13
8
Mirage
20%
5
7
Dust II
0%
0
3
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Take Flyte vs WITHOUT WARNING by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Take Flyte and WITHOUT WARNING, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Take Flyte. The MVP of this match was Wolffe.
Take Flyte analytics
The team Take Flyte secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Take Flyte were Wolffe contributed 26 kills and Umar contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9922 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Take Flyte held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
WITHOUT WARNING analytics
The team WITHOUT WARNING managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for WITHOUT WARNING were consti contributed 21 kills and Tender contributed 20 kills. 9475 of total damage by WITHOUT WARNING could not prevent Take Flyte from securing the victory
On the defensive side, WITHOUT WARNING struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments