0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
154.6963
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
46.416.7
AWP kills on a map
186.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
63.221.6
Deagle kills on a map
61.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
19.95.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:43s00:39s
HE damage (avg/round)
11.33.4
Galil kills on a map
51.8064
Openning kills on a map
9.992.9135
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
33%
Nuke
25%
Overpass
24%
Inferno
17%
Mirage
8%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
1
15
Ancient
33%
3
12
Nuke
78%
18
0
Overpass
57%
7
7
Inferno
33%
9
5
Mirage
58%
12
4
Dust II
71%
14
4
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
12
1
Ancient
0%
1
9
Nuke
53%
17
0
Overpass
33%
6
5
Inferno
50%
16
1
Mirage
50%
2
12
Dust II
71%
7
4
Info
Match analysis of TAG vs LDLC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TAG and LDLC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Dust II, Overpass, Nuke, and victory was secured by LDLC. The MVP of this match was AMANEK.
LDLC analytics
The team LDLC secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LDLC were AMANEK contributed 70 kills and Diviiii contributed 59 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 29547 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LDLC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TAG analytics
The team TAG managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TAG were FpSSS contributed 58 kills and SELLTER contributed 54 kills. 29554 of total damage by TAG could not prevent LDLC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TAG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments