Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
15.74.6
AWP kills on a map
246.5798
Eco wins full buy
1
Eco wins full buy
1
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Teammate kills
1
HE damage (total/round)
9826.8
HE damage (total/round)
13526.8
HE damage (total/round)
11026.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
43%
Inferno
30%
Overpass
30%
Mirage
28%
Dust II
17%
Vertigo
14%
Ancient
13%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
68%
22
0
Inferno
80%
10
9
Overpass
20%
5
23
Mirage
60%
10
9
Dust II
42%
12
3
Vertigo
14%
7
16
Ancient
13%
8
12
Last 5 maps
Nuke
25%
12
6
Inferno
50%
10
4
Overpass
50%
6
1
Mirage
88%
8
2
Dust II
25%
8
12
Vertigo
0%
0
21
Ancient
0%
3
6
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of SWS vs Keyd by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SWS and Keyd, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by SWS. The MVP of this match was raafa.
SWS analytics
The team SWS secured 19 out of 35 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SWS were Gafolo contributed 32 kills and chay contributed 23 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13254 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SWS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Keyd analytics
The team Keyd managed to secure 16 out of 35 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Keyd were raafa contributed 32 kills and t9rnay contributed 26 kills. 12484 of total damage by Keyd could not prevent SWS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Keyd struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments