SWS Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

24

8

2

+16

102

0:2

8

1

8.1

+49%

23

11

2

+12

111

5:0

5

0

8.0

+33%

18

10

9

+8

90

5:4

6

0

6.9

+17%

14

9

3

+5

63

0:1

2

1

5.9

+14%

13

11

5

+2

73

3:2

4

0

5.9

+1%

Total

92

49

21

+43

438

13:9

25

2

7.0

+23%

INTZ Scoreboard Mirage (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

14

17

1

-3

74

0:1

2

0

5.8

-3%

12

20

2

-8

60

5:4

3

0

5.2

-27%

8

18

0

-10

50

0:0

1

0

4.5

-35%

7

19

3

-12

47

2:3

0

0

4.4

-35%

8

18

3

-10

51

2:5

1

0

4.3

-31%

Total

49

92

9

-43

283

9:13

7

0

4.8

-26%

Teams advantage Mirage (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SWS vs INTZ by the Bo3.gg Team

SWS on Mirage Analysis

SWS demonstrated their prowers on Mirage, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SWS on Mirage were w1, who contributed 24 kills, and matios, who added 23 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Mirage, the team inflicted a total of 9636 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Mirage, SWS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


INTZ on Mirage Analysis

Mirage proved to be a challenging battleground for INTZ, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for INTZ on Mirage included nolkz, who contributed 14 kills, and paiva, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6228 total damage, INTZ couldn't prevent SWS from securing victory on Mirage


On the defensive side of Mirage, INTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date