0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
4.7
7.3
Inferno2.5
Win Rounds
3
16
Inferno13
Kills
42
83
Inferno41
Damage
5.11K
8.74K
Inferno3627
Economy
315.3K
468.6K
Inferno153300
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
100%
Overpass
65%
Vertigo
65%
Dust II
62%
Inferno
60%
Ancient
31%
Mirage
30%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
100%
1
12
Overpass
65%
20
3
Vertigo
65%
23
7
Dust II
62%
21
1
Inferno
60%
25
1
Ancient
31%
16
1
Mirage
30%
10
5
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Sweetbonanza vs ALTERNATE aTTaX by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sweetbonanza and ALTERNATE aTTaX, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by ALTERNATE aTTaX. The MVP of this match was PANIX.
ALTERNATE aTTaX analytics
The team ALTERNATE aTTaX secured 0 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ALTERNATE aTTaX were PANIX contributed 22 kills and awzek contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8736 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ALTERNATE aTTaX held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sweetbonanza analytics
The team Sweetbonanza managed to secure 19 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sweetbonanza were seael contributed 10 kills and zangetsu contributed 8 kills. 5109 of total damage by Sweetbonanza could not prevent ALTERNATE aTTaX from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sweetbonanza struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments