0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
Speed Round (sec)
00:31s01:54s
Player score (round)
34641011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
L
100%
Mirage
L
50%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
0
Mirage
50%
4
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwlw
- wllww
Info
Match analysis of Stand On Business vs LOSTHILLS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Stand On Business and LOSTHILLS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by LOSTHILLS. The MVP of this match was X0G.
LOSTHILLS analytics
The team LOSTHILLS secured 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for LOSTHILLS were X0G contributed 27 kills and Brashi contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8810 overall damage.
On the defensive side, LOSTHILLS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Stand On Business analytics
The team Stand On Business managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Stand On Business were milesd contributed 24 kills and Natra3p contributed 21 kills. 8088 of total damage by Stand On Business could not prevent LOSTHILLS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Stand On Business struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments