Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Headshots (total/map)
248
Damage (total/round)
42873
Player score (round)
40551012
Shots (total/round)
8716
Player score (round)
36511012
Damage (total/round)
42373
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
60%
Nuke
44%
Vertigo
27%
Inferno
24%
Overpass
20%
Mirage
18%
Ancient
17%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
89%
19
2
Nuke
44%
9
3
Vertigo
0%
0
29
Inferno
38%
16
8
Overpass
70%
10
7
Mirage
54%
13
3
Ancient
0%
1
7
Last 5 maps
Dust II
29%
7
4
Nuke
0%
1
21
Vertigo
27%
11
3
Inferno
14%
7
13
Overpass
50%
10
6
Mirage
36%
11
2
Ancient
17%
6
0
Info
Match analysis of Spirit vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Spirit and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Spirit. The MVP of this match was mir.
Spirit analytics
The team Spirit secured 22 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Spirit were mir contributed 36 kills and degster contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15420 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Spirit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 18 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 32 kills and shz contributed 30 kills. 14786 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Spirit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments