0 Comments
74
70
28
+4
371
14:8
19
3
-4%
Teams advantage Anubis (M1)
Lineups
Lineup
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Stand-in
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
79%
Dust II
64%
Ancient
56%
Mirage
29%
Nuke
11%
Anubis
T
5%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
79%
14
2
Dust II
64%
14
3
Ancient
56%
25
13
Mirage
79%
24
2
Nuke
78%
27
0
Anubis
45%
22
16
Inferno
0%
0
29
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Mirage
50%
2
0
Nuke
67%
3
0
Anubis
50%
2
0
Inferno
0%
0
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlwl
- wlwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Spirit Academy vs TGM by the Bo3.gg Team
Spirit Academy on Anubis Analysis
Spirit Academy demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Spirit Academy on Anubis were Mokuj1n, who contributed 21 kills, and ROBO, who added 19 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8157 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Anubis, Spirit Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
TGM on Anubis Analysis
Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for TGM, as they managed to secure 9 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for TGM on Anubis included speed4k, who contributed 23 kills, and Carnivore, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7547 total damage, TGM couldn't prevent Spirit Academy from securing victory on Anubis
On the defensive side of Anubis, TGM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments