0 Comments
71
77
24
-6
353
10:13
18
2
-7%
Teams advantage Vertigo (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
64%
Ancient
54%
Vertigo
42%
Inferno
33%
Nuke
28%
Mirage
24%
Anubis
10%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
64%
14
3
Ancient
54%
24
13
Vertigo
80%
15
2
Inferno
0%
0
29
Nuke
78%
27
0
Mirage
78%
23
2
Anubis
50%
24
16
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
3
3
Ancient
0%
2
6
Vertigo
38%
8
1
Inferno
33%
3
4
Nuke
50%
6
3
Mirage
54%
13
0
Anubis
60%
10
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wlwww
- lwlwl
Info
Map Analysis of Spirit Academy vs QUAZAR by the Bo3.gg Team
Spirit Academy on Vertigo Analysis
Spirit Academy demonstrated their prowers on Vertigo, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Spirit Academy on Vertigo were CEMEN_BAKIN, who contributed 17 kills, and Mokuj1n, who added 15 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Vertigo, the team inflicted a total of 8126 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Vertigo, Spirit Academy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
QUAZAR on Vertigo Analysis
Vertigo proved to be a challenging battleground for QUAZAR, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for QUAZAR on Vertigo included whisper, who contributed 25 kills, and n4mb3r5, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8418 total damage, QUAZAR couldn't prevent Spirit Academy from securing victory on Vertigo
On the defensive side of Vertigo, QUAZAR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments