0 Comments
Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
65%
Inferno
S
60%
Nuke
60%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
50%
Overpass
13%
Ancient
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
0
Inferno
100%
3
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
65%
20
0
Inferno
40%
15
4
Nuke
60%
10
3
Dust II
50%
8
0
Vertigo
50%
4
8
Overpass
13%
8
3
Ancient
0%
2
11
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ww
- wlwwl
Info
Map Analysis of Spassk Team vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
Spassk Team on Inferno Analysis
Spassk Team demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 30 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Spassk Team on Inferno were TEGBIS, who contributed 26 kills, and Remill, who added 25 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 11756 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Spassk Team held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Budapest Five on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Budapest Five, as they managed to secure 14 out of 30 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Budapest Five on Inferno included Chill, who contributed 26 kills, and Aaron, who added 18 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 10515 total damage, Budapest Five couldn't prevent Spassk Team from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Budapest Five struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments