0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:29s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:27s
Assists on a map
124.3808
Player score (round)
34841011
Player score (round)
36731011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
50%
Nuke
45%
Ancient
29%
Mirage
23%
Anubis
22%
Inferno
10%
Vertigo
10%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
50%
10
15
Nuke
0%
3
51
Ancient
39%
23
17
Mirage
48%
23
12
Anubis
62%
21
5
Inferno
54%
13
18
Vertigo
40%
15
5
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
66
Nuke
45%
31
11
Ancient
68%
22
17
Mirage
25%
28
32
Anubis
84%
31
1
Inferno
64%
14
14
Vertigo
50%
20
16
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Solid vs Sharks by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Solid and Sharks, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was CSO.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were doc contributed 17 kills and drg contributed 19 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8048 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were CSO contributed 18 kills and Lcm contributed 19 kills. 8339 of total damage by Solid could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments