Inferno
13 - 3
Ancient
13 - 16
Anubis
13 - 9
ODDIK Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

18

4

2

+14

98

1:1

6

2

8.4

+44%

17

7

8

+10

123

3:1

5

0

8.2

+45%

16

8

5

+8

101

3:2

4

0

7.5

+32%

9

7

4

+2

67

2:0

0

0

6.0

+11%

9

6

4

+3

50

2:1

2

0

5.6

+1%

Total

69

32

23

+37

440

11:5

17

2

7.1

+27%

Solid Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

10

13

1

-3

74

1:0

3

1

6.0

-6%

10

15

2

-5

69

2:3

3

0

5.5

-10%

6

13

3

-7

53

1:3

0

0

4.5

-30%

2

15

1

-13

32

1:1

0

0

3.4

-61%

4

14

3

-10

29

0:4

2

0

3.1

-51%

Total

32

70

10

-38

257

5:11

8

1

4.5

-32%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of ODDIK vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team

ODDIK on Inferno Analysis

ODDIK demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for ODDIK on Inferno were togs, who contributed 18 kills, and ksloks, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7041 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, ODDIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Solid on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Solid, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Solid on Inferno included ALLE, who contributed 10 kills, and drg, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4114 total damage, Solid couldn't prevent ODDIK from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date