0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A4 kills on a map
73.4454
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
58.912
USP kills on a map
41.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
274.8
Smoke thrown on a map
1514.5022
Percentage of headshots
54%15%
Galil damage (avg/round)
20.95.9
M4A1 kills on a map
114.4189
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
84.116.3
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
154.1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
69%
Anubis
56%
Mirage
55%
Ancient
50%
Inferno
48%
Vertigo
43%
Nuke
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
1
Anubis
100%
1
1
Mirage
0%
0
4
Ancient
0%
2
1
Inferno
0%
0
1
Vertigo
0%
0
4
Nuke
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
31%
13
9
Anubis
44%
34
12
Mirage
55%
22
10
Ancient
50%
46
10
Inferno
48%
31
12
Vertigo
43%
23
8
Nuke
0%
0
59
Info
Match analysis of Smoke vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Smoke and Solid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by Solid. The MVP of this match was destiny.
Solid analytics
The team Solid secured 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Solid were destiny contributed 17 kills and gbb contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6714 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Solid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Smoke analytics
The team Smoke managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Smoke were MITHPUTTINI contributed 8 kills and s1cko contributed 7 kills. 3608 of total damage by Smoke could not prevent Solid from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Smoke struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments