0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
113
HE damage (avg/round)
17.93.4
M4A1 kills on a map
74.5517
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
54.916.3
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
39.112.3
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
19.13.9
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
3729
USP damage (avg/round)
16.64.7
Assists on a map
7.984.3808
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
45%
Inferno
31%
Anubis
13%
Mirage
10%
Ancient
6%
Overpass
5%
Nuke
5%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
25%
8
38
Inferno
36%
22
24
Anubis
69%
39
10
Mirage
43%
23
16
Ancient
63%
35
3
Overpass
55%
31
17
Nuke
50%
12
33
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
70%
23
15
Inferno
67%
39
5
Anubis
56%
16
47
Mirage
33%
12
64
Ancient
69%
52
3
Overpass
50%
28
17
Nuke
55%
22
21
Last results
Info
Match analysis of SINNERS vs Preasy by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SINNERS and Preasy, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, and victory was secured by Preasy. The MVP of this match was .
Preasy analytics
The team Preasy secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Preasy were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Preasy held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SINNERS were contributed 0 kills and contributed 0 kills. 0 of total damage by SINNERS could not prevent Preasy from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments