0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:27s
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.45.7
USP damage (avg/round)
174.7
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4429
Molotov damage (avg/round)
82
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36791011
Shots (total/round)
9216
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
50%
Inferno
39%
Anubis
29%
Overpass
22%
Vertigo
21%
Ancient
5%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
5
1
Inferno
0%
1
18
Anubis
100%
6
2
Overpass
40%
5
7
Vertigo
50%
2
11
Ancient
62%
13
1
Nuke
40%
5
9
Last 5 maps
Mirage
50%
26
19
Inferno
39%
23
30
Anubis
71%
38
13
Overpass
62%
39
13
Vertigo
29%
14
33
Ancient
67%
33
4
Nuke
42%
12
40
Info
Match analysis of PERA vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between PERA and SINNERS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by SINNERS. The MVP of this match was AJTT.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SINNERS were AJTT contributed 18 kills and beastik contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8861 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PERA analytics
The team PERA managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PERA were Kamion contributed 19 kills and Porya contributed 15 kills. 7669 of total damage by PERA could not prevent SINNERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PERA struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments