Explore Wide Range of
Esports Markets
0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Player score (round)
39781011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
36941011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Dust II
80%
Train
60%
Anubis
60%
Inferno
56%
Ancient
51%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
44%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
80%
5
33
Train
60%
5
10
Anubis
60%
15
26
Inferno
56%
32
10
Ancient
51%
41
11
Nuke
50%
28
9
Mirage
44%
34
5
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Train
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
0
0
In the CS2 match between SINNERS and LPH Gaming, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Train, Ancient, and victory was secured by SINNERS. The MVP of this match was beastik.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Train, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SINNERS were beastik contributed 47 kills and MoriiSko contributed 32 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17788 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
LPH Gaming analytics
The team LPH Gaming managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for LPH Gaming were lojzo contributed 32 kills and Snaxieee contributed 35 kills. 15188 of total damage by LPH Gaming could not prevent SINNERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, LPH Gaming struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments