SINNERS Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

14

0

+2

73

3:2

6

0

6.3

+1%

12

16

4

-4

81

4:0

3

0

6.3

0%

13

15

0

-2

63

4:1

3

0

5.9

-11%

7

14

6

-7

72

2:1

1

0

5.2

-24%

4

20

1

-16

38

0:3

0

0

3.2

-57%

Total

52

79

11

-27

326

13:7

13

0

5.4

-18%

Iron Branch Scoreboard Anubis (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

23

9

2

+14

108

3:2

7

0

8.6

+34%

17

11

6

+6

102

0:3

4

0

7.2

+35%

16

12

3

+4

82

3:3

5

0

6.9

+12%

11

8

5

+3

72

1:1

2

0

6.2

+6%

12

12

4

0

65

0:4

3

0

5.6

-2%

Total

79

52

20

+27

428

7:13

21

0

6.9

+17%

Teams advantage Anubis (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs Iron Branch by the Bo3.gg Team

Iron Branch on Anubis Analysis

Iron Branch demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 16 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Iron Branch on Anubis were Ganginho, who contributed 23 kills, and sad, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8567 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, Iron Branch held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SINNERS on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 4 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SINNERS on Anubis included ZEDKO, who contributed 16 kills, and beastik, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6527 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent Iron Branch from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date