Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
104.6963
USP damage (avg/round)
13.24.6
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.42
Galil kills on a map
41.8064
Galil damage (avg/round)
22.65.6
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.216.7
HE kills on a map
21.127
Deagle kills on a map
41.6964
Deagle damage (avg/round)
21.25.4
Shots (total/round)
8816
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
68%
Vertigo
38%
Ancient
20%
Overpass
14%
Inferno
13%
Mirage
8%
Nuke
1%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
51
Vertigo
58%
33
2
Ancient
70%
20
1
Overpass
57%
14
27
Inferno
65%
20
17
Mirage
55%
22
16
Nuke
61%
28
7
Last 5 maps
Dust II
68%
25
1
Vertigo
20%
5
39
Ancient
50%
16
15
Overpass
43%
21
8
Inferno
78%
9
12
Mirage
47%
15
18
Nuke
60%
15
4
Info
Match analysis of SINNERS vs HAVU by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SINNERS and HAVU, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Ancient, and victory was secured by HAVU. The MVP of this match was ZOREE.
HAVU analytics
The team HAVU secured 32 out of 48 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Ancient. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for HAVU were ZOREE contributed 43 kills and sLowi contributed 42 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19488 overall damage.
On the defensive side, HAVU held their ground firmly, successfully defending 19 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS managed to secure 16 out of 48 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SINNERS were NEOFRAG contributed 35 kills and oskar contributed 31 kills. 15933 of total damage by SINNERS could not prevent HAVU from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments