Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
41.6558
Player score (round)
36991010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42671010
Damage (total/round)
48973
Player score (round)
45421010
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Nuke
43%
Inferno
18%
Anubis
14%
Ancient
12%
Mirage
9%
Dust II
7%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
100%
2
60
Nuke
43%
40
3
Inferno
57%
46
7
Anubis
46%
24
29
Ancient
59%
39
22
Mirage
57%
37
18
Dust II
59%
32
2
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
33%
12
10
Nuke
0%
2
21
Inferno
39%
31
1
Anubis
32%
22
17
Ancient
47%
32
7
Mirage
48%
25
1
Dust II
52%
21
1
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of SINNERS vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SINNERS and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Mirage, and victory was secured by SINNERS. The MVP of this match was Majky.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS secured 26 out of 43 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Mirage. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SINNERS were Majky contributed 40 kills and oskar contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16491 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 17 out of 43 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were H1te contributed 33 kills and AW contributed 26 kills. 15022 of total damage by DMS could not prevent SINNERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments