0 Comments
78
53
15
+25
382
13:9
17
1
+13%
Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Records Inferno
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
133.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:27s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
5730
Smoke thrown on a map
2515.0371
Deagle damage (avg/round)
17.75.4
Molotov damage (avg/round)
8.92
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
123.8
Shots (total/round)
9716
Player score (round)
36961012
Info
Map Analysis of Copenhagen Flames vs SINNERS by the Bo3.gg Team
Copenhagen Flames on Inferno Analysis
Copenhagen Flames demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 22 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Copenhagen Flames on Inferno were regali, who contributed 18 kills, and BuNNy, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8405 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, Copenhagen Flames held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
SINNERS on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for SINNERS, as they managed to secure 6 out of 22 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for SINNERS on Inferno included FORSYY, who contributed 14 kills, and beastik, who added 17 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6543 total damage, SINNERS couldn't prevent Copenhagen Flames from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, SINNERS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments