0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Mirage
45%
Ancient
42%
Inferno
33%
Anubis
29%
Nuke
24%
Vertigo
17%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
1
Mirage
0%
2
3
Ancient
0%
5
1
Inferno
0%
1
3
Anubis
67%
6
0
Nuke
71%
7
1
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Dust II
0%
0
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
30
Mirage
45%
11
15
Ancient
42%
31
4
Inferno
33%
9
12
Anubis
38%
13
3
Nuke
47%
17
3
Vertigo
67%
30
2
Dust II
0%
0
3
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lllww
- wlwll
Info
Match analysis of Singularity vs PGE Turow by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Singularity and PGE Turow, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Singularity. The MVP of this match was POLO.
Singularity analytics
The team Singularity secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Singularity were POLO contributed 27 kills and virtuoso contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9719 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Singularity held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
PGE Turow analytics
The team PGE Turow managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for PGE Turow were darko contributed 17 kills and gRuChA contributed 15 kills. 7992 of total damage by PGE Turow could not prevent Singularity from securing the victory
On the defensive side, PGE Turow struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments