0 Comments
80
96
20
-16
238
10:14
17
1
Inferno5.5
0%
Teams advantage
Score
5.5
6.3
Inferno0.8
Win Rounds
17
19
Inferno2
Kills
80
123
Inferno43
Damage
8.56K
13.63K
Inferno5065
Economy
650.45K
872.55K
Inferno222100
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
100%
Vertigo
100%
Nuke
50%
Ancient
50%
Inferno
38%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Ancient
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Mirage
0%
1
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
2
0
Nuke
50%
4
0
Ancient
50%
2
0
Inferno
38%
8
0
Mirage
0%
5
0
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- ll
- lllwl
Info
Match analysis of sickboyzz vs Leo by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between sickboyzz and Leo, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Leo. The MVP of this match was fenny.
Leo analytics
The team Leo secured 0 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Leo were fenny contributed 28 kills and muR contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13629 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Leo held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
sickboyzz analytics
The team sickboyzz managed to secure 36 out of 36 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for sickboyzz were ioriSempai contributed 21 kills and zangetsu contributed 23 kills. 8564 of total damage by sickboyzz could not prevent Leo from securing the victory
On the defensive side, sickboyzz struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 18 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments