0 Comments
Teams advantage
Score
5.3
6.8
Vertigo1.5
Win Rounds
8
13
Vertigo5
Kills
60
86
Vertigo26
Damage
7.23K
9.19K
Vertigo1965
Economy
341.65K
391.45K
Vertigo49800
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
H
100%
Nuke
H
67%
Vertigo
60%
Ancient
50%
Anubis
40%
Inferno
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
1
0
Nuke
100%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
1
Inferno
0%
0
3
Mirage
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
1
2
Nuke
33%
3
0
Vertigo
60%
5
0
Ancient
50%
2
1
Anubis
40%
5
0
Inferno
0%
0
2
Mirage
0%
0
3
Info
Match analysis of Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng vs SHPL by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng and SHPL, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, and victory was secured by SHPL. The MVP of this match was NARONE.
SHPL analytics
The team SHPL secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SHPL were NARONE contributed 24 kills and madness contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9191 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SHPL held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng analytics
The team Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng were GOD contributed 16 kills and 2HP contributed 15 kills. 7226 of total damage by Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng could not prevent SHPL from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Hui Tu Zhuan Sheng struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments