Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3023
AK47 kills on a map
116.5888
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Galil kills on a map
61.8171
Galil kills on a map
41.8171
Player score (round)
47261011
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42701011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
60%
Vertigo
52%
Mirage
30%
Ancient
29%
Nuke
17%
Inferno
10%
Dust II
0%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
79%
34
0
Vertigo
48%
25
7
Mirage
22%
23
30
Ancient
68%
19
20
Nuke
26%
23
21
Inferno
39%
18
19
Dust II
0%
0
4
Last 5 maps
Anubis
19%
21
9
Vertigo
100%
1
52
Mirage
52%
23
18
Ancient
39%
28
8
Nuke
43%
14
27
Inferno
29%
7
34
Dust II
0%
0
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs W7M by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and W7M, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was togs.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 26 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Mirage. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were togs contributed 41 kills and doc contributed 37 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15767 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
W7M analytics
The team W7M managed to secure 14 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for W7M were card contributed 25 kills and -stormzin contributed 23 kills. 11784 of total damage by W7M could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, W7M struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments