Vertigo
13 - 8
Inferno
11 - 13
Anubis
16 - 12
Sharks Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

21

13

4

+8

84

1:0

5

0

6.9

+15%

16

15

4

+1

75

5:2

4

1

6.7

+3%

15

16

6

-1

68

0:2

3

0

5.7

-3%

16

18

6

-2

67

4:5

3

0

5.7

-12%

10

17

10

-7

59

1:4

1

0

4.9

-15%

Total

78

79

30

-1

353

11:13

16

1

6.0

-2%

Solid Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

17

15

6

+2

83

4:0

4

0

6.7

+2%

20

19

5

+1

88

2:0

5

1

6.4

+8%

15

11

3

+4

64

3:2

3

2

6.3

+9%

16

18

6

-2

74

1:0

2

0

5.9

-6%

10

17

9

-7

57

3:9

3

0

4.5

-19%

Total

78

80

29

-2

366

13:11

17

3

5.9

-1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team

Solid on Inferno Analysis

Solid demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Solid on Inferno were gbb, who contributed 17 kills, and xureba, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8775 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Solid held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Sharks on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included Koala, who contributed 21 kills, and rdnzao, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8466 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent Solid from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date