Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Damage (total/round)
38473
Player score (round)
34641012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
47061012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Anubis
82%
Dust II
71%
Overpass
50%
Inferno
25%
Nuke
25%
Mirage
15%
Vertigo
13%
Ancient
11%
Last 5 maps
Anubis
82%
11
4
Dust II
71%
7
0
Overpass
0%
0
39
Inferno
45%
11
23
Nuke
25%
16
16
Mirage
65%
20
3
Vertigo
54%
13
7
Ancient
89%
18
7
Last 5 maps
Anubis
0%
3
2
Dust II
0%
0
0
Overpass
50%
4
1
Inferno
20%
5
1
Nuke
0%
0
8
Mirage
50%
2
4
Vertigo
67%
3
0
Ancient
100%
3
2
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and Solid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Vertigo, Anubis, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was chay.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were chay contributed 48 kills and togs contributed 46 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20038 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were Lcm contributed 30 kills and gbb contributed 32 kills. 16220 of total damage by Solid could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments