0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
124.6963
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
16.23.8
Player score (round)
38361012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
HE damage (total/round)
9226.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
67%
Ancient
64%
Inferno
50%
Nuke
47%
Dust II
38%
Mirage
21%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
67%
15
4
Ancient
64%
11
8
Inferno
50%
16
14
Nuke
53%
15
9
Dust II
38%
13
9
Mirage
71%
21
0
Overpass
0%
0
35
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
6
Ancient
0%
0
3
Inferno
100%
1
2
Nuke
100%
2
0
Dust II
0%
3
1
Mirage
50%
2
1
Overpass
0%
0
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwwwl
- wwwll
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs Sao Caetano by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and Sao Caetano, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was chay.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 16 out of 26 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were chay contributed 27 kills and zevy contributed 22 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10798 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sao Caetano analytics
The team Sao Caetano managed to secure 10 out of 26 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sao Caetano were SHOOWTiME contributed 23 kills and danoco contributed 23 kills. 9256 of total damage by Sao Caetano could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sao Caetano struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments