Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Clutch (opponents)
2
M4A1 kills on a map
124.491
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Damage (total/round)
42473
Player score (round)
39991011
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
37%
Dust II
25%
Mirage
24%
Ancient
19%
Inferno
11%
Vertigo
11%
Anubis
11%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
23%
26
21
Dust II
0%
0
6
Mirage
24%
25
30
Ancient
67%
21
20
Inferno
39%
18
19
Vertigo
44%
27
7
Anubis
80%
35
0
Last 5 maps
Nuke
60%
30
5
Dust II
25%
4
0
Mirage
0%
0
63
Ancient
48%
23
22
Inferno
50%
18
24
Vertigo
33%
18
25
Anubis
69%
26
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs ODDIK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and ODDIK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by ODDIK. The MVP of this match was doc.
ODDIK analytics
The team ODDIK secured 26 out of 48 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Vertigo. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ODDIK were lineko contributed 34 kills and matios contributed 30 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16150 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ODDIK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 22 out of 48 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were doc contributed 31 kills and Gafolo contributed 31 kills. 16079 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent ODDIK from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments