Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
13.63.4
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.43.8
Shots (total/round)
9316
Damage (total/round)
42673
Player score (round)
37151012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
33%
Mirage
30%
Inferno
20%
Ancient
14%
Overpass
10%
Nuke
7%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
53%
15
9
Mirage
63%
19
11
Inferno
63%
16
19
Ancient
53%
17
13
Overpass
50%
2
45
Nuke
50%
18
11
Vertigo
50%
18
3
Last 5 maps
Dust II
20%
5
16
Mirage
33%
6
9
Inferno
43%
7
8
Ancient
67%
6
6
Overpass
60%
5
11
Nuke
43%
14
3
Vertigo
50%
4
8
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs Meta by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and Meta, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was realziN.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 45 out of 81 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Inferno. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were realziN contributed 45 kills and zevy contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 20271 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 24 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Meta analytics
The team Meta managed to secure 35 out of 81 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 10 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Meta were Alisson contributed 37 kills and Demonos contributed 35 kills. 17378 of total damage by Meta could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Meta struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 17 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments