Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
68%
Dust II
53%
Mirage
35%
Inferno
20%
Ancient
6%
Anubis
5%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
68%
28
2
Dust II
0%
1
56
Mirage
65%
34
10
Inferno
47%
17
25
Ancient
66%
29
11
Anubis
53%
30
5
Nuke
44%
34
25
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
0
40
Dust II
53%
19
18
Mirage
30%
20
18
Inferno
67%
30
6
Ancient
60%
30
11
Anubis
58%
19
12
Nuke
46%
26
7
Last results
Info
Map Analysis of Sharks vs inSanitY by the Bo3.gg Team
on Inferno Analysis
demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for on Inferno were , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 0 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Inferno, held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Sharks on Inferno Analysis
Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Sharks, as they managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Sharks on Inferno included , who contributed 0 kills, and , who added 0 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 0 total damage, Sharks couldn't prevent from securing victory on Inferno
On the defensive side of Inferno, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments